Quote:
Originally posted by island911
Part of the problem; Science types rarely talk about where their knowlege ends. . . .what it doesn't explain. They generally want to tell you how their model does work.
Newtons models work great - undisputable, repeatalble . . .until Einstein came along. 
Unified theory . . . the answer is between zero and one. --easy, right.
|
And that's a great argument against ID, science by its very nature postulates, proves, learns, disproves, repostulates, etc. It's a constant learning process.
it's no secret that there is also a disparity between quantum mechanics and astrophysics, but that's no reason to think God is the answer.
I think ID people are just lazy. Why experience life as a continual learning process when you can just pick up The Bible and have all the answers neatly described. 'Course you'll have to choose which version of Creationism is the right one, but that's what coins are for.