Quote:
Originally posted by legion
Rodeo,
I am going to have to agree with you here.
I was initially opposed to the SC decision on eminent domain. As I realized that the decision simply said "nothing restricts this in the Constitution, but laws can be passed that do", I understood why this was the right decision.
This one will take me some time to ponder, but my knee-jerk reaction is that the 9th Circuit has messed up again...
|
Given that analysis of the Kelko case, why this reaction on the current case? The court is saying basically the same thing - the constitution does not prevent this, but laws or political action can.