Quote:
Originally posted by Nathans_Dad
Well that's a nice article from a questionable source. Unfortunately I couldn't surf through the site to "consider the source" as I usually do because I don't subscribe and can't get past the front page. It is a little bit suspicious that their front page has a link to a moveon.org ad.
Anyhow, that's a nice story and if it is ever proven that those documents actually say what this reporter says he heard people say it says then you will have Bush in a lie...till then it's all hearsay.
NEXT
|
It's National Journal, ask around. It's not in any sense a "questionable source," nor is it partisan. The "link" you saw to MoveOn.org was a story on MoveOn's new ad campaign, not an ad or a link.
So I find it interesting how quickly you dismiss a 20,000 word article. I expect that from the daddy, but one would have thought there would be something in there that piqued your interest.
But I guess the ground rules for this game are:
1. Post a PDF of a classified document (no problem!)
2. Put that document in the president's hands (again no prob!), and then
3. Post a quote directly contrary to that classified document that we can prove with certainty the president read.
Someone should have said that on page one. If the Repubs in Congress can't get the documents, I highly doubt Messers. Bush and Cheney will give them to me. Maybe CC can get them
