|
The truth of the matter is, without an outright admission or a conviction within a court of law of purgury, none will accept it.
I personally think he had to have intentionally lied, either that or his staff hid all kinds of stuff from him, or he's the dumbest person on the planet (I don't think the latter two are possible, I for one don't think he's that dumb and I don't think info was hidden from him) but without an admission or conviction, it's unprovable what he specifically was told regarding the mountains of contradictory evidence, knowledge of the details of the downing street meetings, etc., and thus lied (this is regarding Iraq). And even if that happened (conviction or admission), you'd still have some people here denying it.....
|