So, Superman, wages should be set to guarantee a certain OUTCOME? That a union is justified in pumping up wages to maintain some sort of outdated Beaver Cleaver standard of living?
Quote:
|
Who, besides consulting actuaries, can afford this today?
|
Precisely! All workers are affected--why should union members be exempt?
The issue isn't standard of living, it's that the unions apply pressure artificially shifting resources (supposedly) for the benefit of their members.
But--as always with union discussions--this is all semantics and theory. The corruption throughout the unions twists the present manifestation of any possible good that they did in the past.