Quote:
Originally posted by Jeff Higgins
Shaun, isn't this the cornerstone of liberal "religious" dogma? Aberations, deviations from the normal course of nature, do normally prove to be inferior. In the natural world, they seldom survive for long at all. Yet this theory, centered around aberations actually being superior, and surviving to reproduce, continues to thrive virtually unchallenged. Liberalism even defends it with a somewhat religious zeal. Which is it then; are aberations inferior or superior? Or is it all in the connotation?
|
Jeff, I have no idea what the cornerstone is. Our statements agree and from a strict biological perspective can be tested and proven. the issue I have is that humans have at this point risen above the biology, so the same rules don't apply. And it's this ascension (pun intended), that provides us with the opportunity for a homosexual lifestyle to be equal to a heterosexual lifestyle on all levels.