Quote:
Originally posted by lendaddy
So they set out on a ten year study using only their own funds to avoid partison claims and low and behold their methodology is so flawed that the entire study can be dismissed in seconds.
That's the claim?
You don't think that over those ten years Bob might have turned to Dave and said: You know I was thinking about the premis of our study and............
|
len, you're not reading carefully. They didn't work on the study for ten years. They had college undergrads review news stories published or broadcast over the past ten years. Here, I'll pull out the quote for you:
"in the work, which took close to three years to complete"
Anyway, why are you so impressed by the "ten year" thing? If there's a problem in someone's methodology, does it matter if he uses that methodology for three years, ten years, or twenty?