Quote:
Originally posted by jyl
len, you're not reading carefully. They didn't work on the study for ten years. They had college undergrads review news stories published or broadcast over the past ten years. Here, I'll pull out the quote for you: "in the work, which took close to three years to complete"
Anyway, why are you so impressed by the "ten year" thing? If there's a problem in someone's methodology, does it matter if he uses that methodology for three years, ten years, or twenty?
|
No I'm not impressed by that, I just think you should go into research consultation. You could have saved these guys a lot of trouble!
