Quote:
Originally posted by techweenie
Actually, they are happy to NOT support the administration when on the rare occasion, their mistakes are admitted: despite the fact the Bushies have said they were wrong on the Saddam - al Quaeda link and on the WMD threat, a handful of PPOT folks are clinging to the original lies, still.
|
Just curious... Do you think it's possible, within the bounds of the conceivable, that Bush (and just about every intelligence source on the planet) could have simply been
mistaken about the status of Saddam's WMD program, without necessarily LYING about it? Or is it always the case that believing something that later turns out to be untrue or partially true, makes one a "liar". Usually when I accuse someone of lying, I have some sort of evidence, preferably proof, that they
intentionally meant to deceive.