Quote:
Originally posted by RallyJon
This is a silly thread, started by (yet another) posting of a silly article from a biased source. When you lefties post this sort of crap, it's no better then when Mul posts the right wing version.
|
Translation: He doesn't know squat about the subject, so preffers to trap shoot the speaker instead.
Quote:
|
Got a good, sound argument without hyperbole, exaggeration, half-truths and strawmen? Then post it up.
|
Translation: He didn't read any of the article, and if he had, he wouldn't understand any of it.
Quote:
|
You might start with making an actual case that ANYTHING the administration did was against the law. Just because all the liberal columnists cry "unconstitutional" and then cite something that doesn't apply in this case, doesn't make for Bushie in prison. Make the case for real, STFU, or get joke responses to your joke posts.
|
We know Bush isn't likely to go to jail, anymore than Clinton was at risk for jail time. The government won't put it's loyal soldiers in jail unless they're from a lesser station, or get so carried away as to cast fecal matter on some of the golden boys.
Duke Cunningham for example.
As for STFU, as soon as hell freezes over, I'll get right on it.