[Lorenfb]

"The factory did the same thing in their various chip offering up to and including the "cup" chip."

- Wil Ferch -

So what does this mean?

Yes, it's well known that Porsche did change the timing maps from the early '84,
but it reached a point were Porsche determined a max as evidenced by the
fact that they did NOT continue to "push" the timing in the Club Sport DME
which was the "higher performance" 911 3.2, and used the same maps as the
'88/'89 stock maps.

It seems that you continue to overlook the key points of both threads:

1. No rigorous/exhaustive evaluation has been done for performance chips as
suggested by the CR thread, just that no one has had a "blown engine".

2. That for ANY CR change, it's suggested that the engine be thoroughly evaluated.

So where's the logic here? It sounds more like the "blind leading the blind" and
a disregard for what most don't want to hear or accept. If one reads both threads
about CR & performance chips, there's basically no difference between either
mod when it comes to a thorough evaluation of either other than a "street
test" while driving with a laptop, please, what a joke!

"All human communications (written or verbal) require context to be not only clearly understood, but effective as well and I'm glad you provided that."

- Steve Weiner -

Nothing has been taken out of context. May be one needs to re-read and better
understand what one wrote or not write it!