Quote:
Originally posted by red-beard
Well, way way back when, when Coke contained, coke, the Republicans were 'liberals'.
|
Oh how I long for the days of "Real Coke". Cocane is for people like Clinton, but Coca leaves, a slight stimulant, similar to caffine, would be a welcome drink. Maybe, just maybe it would reduce the desire of some for the more potent stuff. Ie a small fix if good, but a big one bad, just like drinking to much. Most people do not drink to much, so why punish the responsible people for the acts of a bunch of loosers. I have never tried "real coke" but I have read the history of this country and of the people that did try it. Being lied to is the best way to cause civil dissobedience. Or is it just about keeping the darkies in their place? THat seems to be the only explanation for our current laws.
How does it help your child to put them prison for the rest of their life to protect them from the evil demons of drugs? Which is worse, no life because of drugs or no life because of a use of drugs, ie prison. Same difference to me and my kid. The only thing drug laws seem to produce is record income for various groups of people, mostly politicians.
I would rather have my kid rot and have no life due to drugs, with some chance of redemption, than have them in prison for the rest of their life, no chance for anything. And from what I have learned prison does not mean no drugs, just more drugs.
I am lucky not to have a kid in this situation, but if I did I would feel betrayed by the system.
Then there is John De Lorian, explain that to someone in prison.