|
"Bloody heck, who cares about showing both sides of the issue, why not try to show the truth for once... yar?"
... and the truth is .... (drum roll)
"btw, why would you say "moderate Muslim"? If this peice had any teeth it would appeal to the not so moderate Muslim . . . which is what is does . .. in a very inflamitory way."
Same way a different point of view might be interpreted by anyone with their beliefs carved in stone.
"Had those words been spoken by a Muslim man (rather than a "Heritic woman") then you may have had a point about Al Jezzera being on the "fair & Balanced" high ground."
You mean to theorize that Al Jezzera purposely allowed a lowly heretic woman to speak forcefully knowing her POV would be minimized by their listeners? Hmmm, interesting theory. But why allow her to speak in the first place? They didn't have to; just to concoct this reverse-psychological move: "Although we don't agree, we want to APPEAR fair and balanced, so we're going to broadcast this message from a lowly heretic woman whose message is daring, provocative and with some hard questions to answer to thousands of viewers"? If it's a one-sided message they want to deliver, they'd be better off following the strategies of Pat Robertson's CBN.
Island. I don't think Nielson TV polls reach the middle east.
|