Quote:
Originally posted by 911pcars
I'm also for truth and not seditious hate speech, but allow me to clarify. If instead of Bush the last 6 years, Clinton was POTUS and he had the same policies, waged the same war in Iraq, thought, acted and functioned as Bush did during Katrina, Supreme Court nominations, UAE port sales, NSA eavesdropping, etc., etc. etc., would you support Clinton (or anyone else) in the same manner?
|
Clinton would have bombed Serbia, been credited with all good in Katrina and given an award for civil rights, nominated far-left Justices without nary a peep out of Republicans, gave his buddies in Dubai (FYI, they have given 100s of thousands to the Clinton liebury) a better deal than Bush (the press would have provided cover fire), the NSA wiretapping would be hailed as brilliance, etc., etc., etc.
Clinton was not Bush. Clinton bombed Serbia after the WTC-1, Kobar, Embassy bombings and the Cole. Clinton appointed an ACLU head to the Supreme Court, Clinton actually used the IRS and illegally obtained 900 FBI files on his enemies, Clinton sold missile technology to the Chinese Military for campaign contributions, and as a piece de resistance he pardoned corporate crooks, cocaine traffickers and terrorists.
Really no comparison, but to answer your question..NO...Clinton could not be trusted, Bush has proven himself a man of his word.