Quote:
Originally posted by Jeff Higgins
You need to go back and actually read some of what I have had to say on this topic. Or maybe you have, and simply failed to understand any of it. It would not be the first (and certainly not the last) time. It appears you have made up your (rather narrow) mind concerning me and my opinions and are no longer able to read beyond what you want to read. I know it's tough, but try looking beyond your paradigm of Bush=bad and Jeff=Bush.
In your simple little world, it appears that the only reason our invasion of Iraq was wrong is because it happened on Bush's watch. Any amount of evidence could be presented at this point implicating Iraq in its manufacture of WMD's and in its support of terrorism. You will sumarily dismiss any and all of it, then sit back all confused and befuddled once again, searching your memory for what you perceive to be an adequate response. And, once again - wait, this is groundbreaking stuff - "Bush lied". There, that showed 'em.
|
You'll be happy to know that I read that very carefully
But nowhere do I see an answer to this: Was Iraq an "imminent threat" to America in April of 2003?
Bonus points: Is Geroge Bush a "conservative?"
If you chose to actually state your positions on these issues, please keep it simple. As you know, I'm not that smart
A simple yes or no, followed by an explanation if you wish, will do.
If you don't want to state your positions, I'll assume that your blathering on about how I think Bush is evil, etc. etc. is just a diversion.
I'm happy to both state and defend my positions on our president, which are not as simplistic as you make them to be. Will you do the same?