Quote:
Originally posted by dhoward
No Pat.
My response is again related to my direct experience with the BATFE, and the policies surrounding FFL's, LEUP's, storage magazines and the regulations surrounding them. While I wasn't pleased with the change in FFL regulations, I could understand some of the reasoning. There were, in my knowledge FFL holders who were not responsible in their dealings with firearms. There were too many for the staff of field agents available to ensure compliance.
This definitely had an effect on me at the time, as I was shooting competitively at the professional level, and obtained most of my parts and tools using the license. The use of a 'storefront' FFL holder was an inconvenience.
I would like to hear about your direct experience in this area.
Or are you just parroting some crap you read on a website?
Again.
|
When the FFL was created in 1968, perhaps you're too young to remember this, there were deep and wide assurances that there would
never be any obstructions to any law abiding citizen who wished to obtain one being processed to do so. The FFL was
only to prevent criminals from buying guns in wholesale lots and shipping them to whomever they wished.
I am NEVER interested in what challenges are put upon a government agency whose job is unConstitutional in the first place, one whose agents should in fact be neutralized with extreme prejudice, much less arrested and granted trials.
If you want to support the Constitution, stop making excuses for Bush and demand that he honor his sworn duty to defend the Constitution and eliminate the restrictions on obtaining an FFL at the least, and elininate the BATFAE at best.