|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Nor California & Pac NW
Posts: 24,870
|
Last post then back to work -
One reason I did the study is because the houses here seem to be listed using total sq ft, including finished/unfinished basement sq ft and finished attic sq ft.
My theory was that finished basement sq ft should count for less than main floor sq ft, since it looks like a cave no matter what; that finished attic sq ft should count for less than main floor sq ft, since its odd-shaped and often only usable as a rumpus room for short people; that unfinished basement sq ft should count for much less since its bare concrete and usually lower ceilings; so that main floor sq ft should be more predictive than total (finished and unfinished) sq ft. To my surprise, not so - they were equally insignificant, statistically speaking.
Anyway, I used my regressions to estimate a range of values for this particular house, despite the questionable statistical validity, and find it is listed at $100K over the estimate value range. Plus it is, as I said, a corner lot on a semi-busy street, and also at the periphery of the highly desirable area rather than right smack in the heart of it. But its got that curb appeal.
__________________
1989 3.2 Carrera coupe; 1988 Westy Vanagon, Zetec; 1986 E28 M30; 1994 W124; 2004 S211
What? Uh . . . “he” and “him”?
|