|
pwd:
Apparently, the guy retired after 29 years of service with the "Agency". What administration would this put in office at his hire date and precisely what would this have to do with anyting? Does the White House approve or disapprove of every potential CIA employee?
The gentleman made a statement that he was told that the emphasis would no longer be on WMD, and was to be touted as "Regime Change".
Whether it was one party or the other, when as many people come "out of the woodwork" as have lately, you have to wonder what is the cause...Is there really a problem? Are they all publicity whores? Is it a side effect of easy access to public airwaves? Can ALL of them simply be labelled as "disgruntled", or "Bush haters?" And possibly even more key: Should the media spend as much time as they do on such stories (Detainee treatment, WMD definitions, leaks), or should the public be kept blithely misinformed? Remember: "Ignorance is Strength".
And mul....before you begin your rant on the media, every individual has access to multiple sources and can make up their minds by prudent sifting. FOX is not the only game in town, no more than CNN or any of the others.
__________________
Bob S. former owner of a 1984 silver 944
|