[VaSteve]

I don't have an hour and a half to devote to sitting in front of the computer watching that, but I did hear the 22 year old director on the radio (O&A show) discussing the video. Since normal media won't have anything to do with him, shows like O&A are the only outlet for the conspiracy theorists.

They made quick work of him.

The controlled demolition thing was one of the easiest to debunk. If you have ever seen one of those controlled demolition things on Discovery channel, you know that they string miles of cable and whatnot into the buildings that are going to go down. They also cut down a lot of the supporting columns. It generally takes a couple of weeks to prep a building...full time.

Assuming #7 was a controlled demo, when did they string all the wiring? When people were at their desks? On weekends? Think about it.

I did see an excerpt filmed from across the river of the WTC purportedly having an explosion in the lobby. If you watch that (or if it's in the long video) notice how the whole screen is blanked just for a second to make that anomoly so much more like an explosion. There is a lot of careful editing there and thing taken out of context that allows the weak or lazy mind to draw conclusions.

It is a fanciful video put together by people who are pretty good at video editing. Credit given there. Research on the other hand, not so good. IIRC from the video, they didn't talk to ANY of the experts that were interviewed or had some involvement in the after the fact analysis. The kind of people that were involved in contributing to the 9/11 commission report.

There are lot of people that don't like Bush. Not my favorite guy either. But I'm willing to accept the fact that we got caught with our pants down by people that hate us on this one. It's easy to distrust Washington especially by those outside the Beltway. I can assure you, it's a miracle ANYTHING gets done....let alone a conspiracy of this magnatude.