Quote:
Originally posted by techweenie
An objective look at 9/11 includes such uncomfortable questions as how we knew so quickly who these people are; how to cope with some evidence that some of the people identified as hijackers have been subsequently seen alive; how so many odd coincidences, from people told not to fly that day to unusual military maneuvers, to extraordinary put purchase activity on United and American Airlines... There's plenty to question and discuss.
|
My theory is that there were f_ckups large and small all over and when put together does the whole thing look like a "master plan". From what I have heard (on sorta good authority) is that the monitored chatter indicated that something big was going to happen, though nobody knew exactly what.
Ever have a hunch?
When I saw the **** going down in NYC, I called my fiance and told her to go home. I didn't specifically know anything was going to happen. Just had a feeling. She said she couldn't and went to some meeting. Then the plane hit and they were all dismissed for the day. Her office mates said that if I ever called again, to do what I said.
As far as grand f_ckups, look at the DC snipers of Fall 2002. This guy and his son(?) went around shooting people from the back of a beat up car. There would be a shooting and they had the city in lockdown for hours. Several times they actually stopped the guy for questioning in these lockdowns, but screwed up because they were looking for a white guy in a white van. Instead it was a couple of black guys in a blue car. When dealing with something that has no precedent sometimes only in retrospect do you see where you have failed. It's a wonder with all the screw ups leading up to 9/11, that it happened at all.
Tech, wasn't the put activity debunked? I do recall hearing about it.