|
Of course I'm being sarcastic.
The point of this piece is whether Bush lied. To counter argue any position with a statement loaded with explosive emotions (people died) is a weak argument. Why not refute the alleged facts of this piece?
Clearly the argument against this is that Bush did know Saddam wasn’t a threat to the US. Why not say this, if Bush really thought Saddam had WMD's, then why is North Korean different? Why have we not threatened to remove their weapons? Add to that India, and Pakistan.
If UN sanctions are the counter argument then why is Israel who is in violation of UN resolutions not dealt with in the same manner? These are credible arguments.
__________________
My uncle has a country place, that no one knows about. He said it used to be a farm, before the motor law.
'72 911T 2,2S motor
'76 BMW 2002
|