Quote:
Originally posted by ChrisBennet
What's the reasoning on married men having a precedence over over unmarried men? Is this assuming that the unmarried man is a the breadwinner or something?
The way I see it, married men got lucky in love and the unmarried ones haven't had the chance yet.
Plan B - row back to the iceberg and get on it.
-Chris
|
Pretty nonsensical. Especially if the married man was a wife batterer or pedophile and the unmarried man a philanthropist or volunteer.
No, there is no moral superiority expressed by marital state, race or gender.