Quote:
Originally posted by Rodeo
EDIT: daddy, I see you attempted an answer. But sticking your head in the sand doesn't count. "Tough *****" means the taxpayers will pay.
|
If in the end the premise is that everyone gets every form of care desired regardless of ability to pay, then yes we should all share it. But I reject that premise.....no pay....no get. (this assumes ability to pay).
Of course I also believe in charity and in helping those that cannot help themselves. So if someone that cannot help themselves needs care they cannot otherwise afford to live, then yes I will gladely pay my share. Tell me I have to pay it all.....then we have a problem.
I also think these "no negligence" comp cases should simply be handles like every other injury or illness..........health insurance. Don't have any (my guy did) then you get shuffled into the system like every other person that has no insurance. You get treated and the taxpayer foots the bill.