[RPKESQ]

Sammyg2, no offense intended, but your examples have numerous flaws. The most glaring of course is the lack of documentation during his (Jesus) life. All history is recorded with some bias. The historians job is to weed out the bias and try to find that facts.

Dead Sea scrolls are from a Christian sect and from much later, therefore not valid (just like the bible).
Regarding the writings of Tacitus, Suetonius, Celsus, Josephus; all while interesting, they are really reporting what they have heard from others, not first hand, and all are from a later period than life of Jesus.

Where is the real-time, during the life, non-Christian witness to this “son of god”? It is very interesting that the Jews who were there and are the ones who have repeatedly dismissed Jesus as a minor prophet. Christianity was one of many sects that sprang up in this time period. It just happens to be one (of a few) that manages to survive for any length of time.

Still lacking first person, non-obvious bias, during his lifetime documentation.

As far as your conclusions: (1) Jesus was a Jewish teacher; (possibly, not proved) (2) many people believed that he performed healings and exorcisms (nonsensical statement, since many more at that time period did not believe in these actions by Jesus, and since many other individuals have had followers that believed that they could do these things too, it proves nothing); (3) he was rejected by the Jewish leaders (so were many others, not much value in that); (4) he was crucified under Pontius Pilate in the reign of Tiberius (lack of official Roman records); (5) despite this shameful death, his followers, who believed that he was still alive, spread beyond Palestine so that there were multitudes of them in Rome by 64 A.D. (as were several other competing religious sects)

So overall, not much in cold hard facts here to support the claim that Jesus, Son of God existed. That does not mean that someone with the name Jesus did not exist, but even that is quite sketchy.