Quote:
Originally posted by zuffen
jluetjen
"Fairness would dictate that you apply the same critisisms (sp?) to the other side of the argument. I don't see them supported by any better proofs."
Am I to assume you mean that application of these criticisms and logic to evolution (rather than to just religion)?
|
Uhhhh -- no. You made a bit of a leap by equating religion with no-belief in "evolution", and you felt that you completely disproved religion based on your logic. If you review your email, you'll see that you didn't even mention "evolution" until the last paragraph. You spent most of your time arguing that logic debunks religion, and only tagged evolution on at the end. I'm only asking that you apply the same logic analysis to Athiesm that you just applied to religion.
Disclaimer -- I'm most likely out of my league on this since I don't even know enough to throw around the latin, so if it's OK with you, all that I'm interested in is the plain English terms. I think that I'll be able to follow you.
