|
At least with physics, mother nature tells you when you are wrong, right away. The main problem with most other science is that nothing tells you, with an in your face answer, that your are dead wrong. That feedback makes for good learning. Without the feedback you tend to get people that think they know the answers, when they do not.
I have written peer reviewed articles for publication in scientific journals. I happen to dislike writing, but like math. Why? because the English language is so screwed up as to be almost nonsensical. Why worry about spelling when there are no standards for spelling, always an exception here, there wherever. This is typical for engineers and scientists. Just like the inconsistencies in evolution, when everything doesn’t make sense, do not regard it highly.
Back to the subject at hand, evolution.
Can someone give me a single example, just one of a form of macro evolution. You know, like a fish becoming a man or a dog becoming a bird or vise versa. Challenge issued!
I can't help the one track minds of some people on this thread. I have repeatedly stated that religion is totally consistent with evolution, yet I continue to read responses that ignore this. Why?
|