[zuffen]

Jluetjen,

good points and it is good to have more civil people in here again....

point number 1) you are not like most people when it comes to this issue as most (assumption) probably stuck around and soaked in what was being said at your church. The issue with the great flood or lack there of is interesting, and can be debated but does little in to prove one side or the other correct. My personal feeling is that the creationist argument is based solely on proving the bible to be correct and thus used as a scientific tool.

Point two) can you clarify what you mean by "negative debating" I can tell you science has been putting forth its ideas and agendas out for the public, science has the option of being found incorrect we just want to see your evidence and testing methods. however just like in this forum some people (on both sides) will espose that that view is stupid and name call etc...

The article was a little acidic but in light of recent attacks on the scientific community by creationists as of late I can see why the tone was a little hostile.