Quote:
Originally posted by reino757
To Peter and the rest of the "doomsday, sky is falling, naysayers".....OK ready class, and I am not going to keep repeating this for the slow learners!
1. Once a magnet is produced (not for free but with energy expelled in the process...are ya gettin this) THEN. it has inherent energy...does it not take some amount to hold up ..let's say a 2lb. piece of metal with a magnet? If you answered yes, bravo, we can now proceed tp principal #2
|
Produce a magnet? Sure create an electromagnet (passing electric current through coil produces a magnetic field) and use this to align the charge in a ferrous material. Problem is that the strength of the resulting magnetic field will be MUCH less than that needed to accomplish this. Also if you load that magnetic field to try and "tap into" the energy you can easily destroy the magnetic field.
The energy to hold up a 2lb load with a magnet? What does that show? You are not accomplishing any work. You are simply not destroying the coupling of the two magnetic fields. To lift (move load vertically) that metal with a magnet reqires the same exact amount of YOUR energy as it would if you lifted it by hand!
Quote:
Originally posted by reino757
2. Rotational kinetic energy....Hmmmnnn don't remember that one??? Well, again for you you slow learners, let me draw you a picture..... ONCE, for example, you spin a cars tire up to speed (note...energy used at this time ! ) THEN, it has inherent "rotational kinetic energy" stored for a limited amount of time.
|
Sure no one is debating that you can have "stored" energy in a rotating mass. If you remove ALL losses, then it would continue to rotate forever. This is not possible but lets pretend. The problem become one of accessing that stored energy. The moment you load the system it will slow down. Even in a frictionless environment. Even if the load is electrical.
Quote:
Originally posted by reino757
Now class...it appears that some of you here "claim" to be of high intellect so I am SURE that you do comprehend thus far...am I right??
BACK TO THE GERERATOR! There is a generator designed that combines these two types of energy, and "in conjunction" , AFTER,energy has been spent initially, can produce electrical current via a rotating prop like magnet blades sandwiched between copper coils and well ....yes It actually produces electricity just like the generator in some of your garages!
Furthermore. since the deregulation of the Utility Companies years ago, THE UTILITY COMPANIESs now purchase KW's from the power grid via numerous sources!, this is but yet another source that supplies the grid (via your homes power feed) and THAT's where the inventor gets his revenue, from the utilitty company. Capiche??
I can't believe I revisited this string of post I had given up on you but I know that there are still some in the class that might understand Physics 101, yes ....101 I hope this helps those multi-degreed persons with the big egos.
I truely expect more comments from the peanut gallery.
|
Blah blah blah. You did not once address any of the losses in the system.
I work with RFID for a living. This involve transfering energy from one device to a completely passive (batteryless) device using magnetic field coupling (capacitive of inductive). This way all of the energy to power both devices is only on one side of the system. Also transformers use magnetic field coupling. For example, I can take a 5V supply and give you back 10V using magnetic fields in a transformer. The hell you say, that would be creating energy. Ah, but you are not looking at what has happened to the current being supplied by the 5V or the current draw available on the 10V side.
Until you can demonstrate even an awareness of Maxwell's Equations, Please for the love of God, stop pretending you are teaching a class.