Quote:
Originally posted by Nathans_Dad
Yay, took only two pages to get to the racial card...
I'll ignore the racial bait and move to the discussion at hand.
Why can I point out things like beastiality, incest, etc? Because they are all sexual deviations, like homosexuality is a sexual deviation. Once you start saying one sexual deviation is ok and should be promoted by society, where do you stop? I guarantee you that the members of NAMBLA (the North American Man-Boy Love Association...yes it really exists) will tell you with a straight face that they are consenting individuals to the act and no one is hurt. How do you tell them that their sexual desire is wrong but being gay is ok?
I think some of the folks on this thread are confusing the ideas of acceptance and indoctrination. I accept that some people are gay, I accept that is their right. I just don't think that the public schools should be in the business of promoting the gay lifestyle.
Kang: When was that Texas sodomy law enacted? I'll help you. 1973. I dunno about you, but I was about one year old then.
Nostatic: I think a lot more conservatives would support my solution than you think...
|
Who decided that homosexuality is a sexual deviation? Your church? These are the kinds of morals that change over the years. It wasn’t that long ago that women couldn’t vote. We finally decided that was wrong and gave them the right to vote. I’m sure some people thought that women voting was immoral. Some people still do. Wake up and realize that homosexuality is no longer considered a deviation.
There is a big difference between NAMBLA and consenting adult homosexuals. With NAMBLA, you have a clear victim. With consenting adult homosexuals, there is none. You asked where do you stop. That’s easy. Look for the victim.
I don’t see the relevance as to when the Texas sodomy law was enacted? Are you saying that there are no conservatives around any more that would enact such a law if the could?