Quote:
Originally posted by nostatic
I'll state this again for those that don't care to read. The distinction is easier than you think: look for the victim. All of the hysterical equivocations (bestiality, child abuse, etc) have clear victims. With gay couples, the only victim is the sensibility of the traditional WASP family structure.
|
Chew on this for a second before you reply:
Why are you able to define a victim in incest but not in homosexuality? You have decided (correctly) that adults should not have sex with children and that the child (even if they swear they enjoyed the sex and asked for it) is a victim. You have drawn a moral line there. It doesn't matter whether the child and adult come forward and announce on national TV that they love each other and want to continue in the relationship, it is still wrong. You draw a moral line at incest but choose to make an exception for homosexuality. I choose to view all sexual deviations as wrong.
The only difference is where you draw the line.