Thread: Moral, Ethical?
View Single Post
competentone competentone is offline
Registered
 
competentone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Summerville, SC
Posts: 2,057
Quote:
Originally posted by Moses
At your first suspicion that the lot was not buildable, you should have told the builder. Instead, you waited 7 weeks.

Now, you are looking at an opportunity to profit from your own mistake at the expense of a valued client. Is that about right?

If you value the builders business, sell the lot at market and forward the profit with a note to the builder. You will have enhanced your reputation and created invaluable goodwill.
Moses, re-read the description and previous comments. My understanding is that the builder is receiving what he wanted and agreed to previously -- the sale had just never closed. The builder is happy with his $35,000. Jim C. was assuming the risk during those years the property hadn't closed -- if the property value had gone down, the builder could have still demanded the $35,000 and Jim would have had to eat the difference if he resold the property.

Additionally, you just can't go around and be "giving" $35,000+ to people. The IRS likes to get their cut in every transaction. The more I think about it, the more I don't like the idea of Jim trying to be "nice" and selling for under fair market value. (Read my previous comment.)
Old 08-29-2006, 11:49 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #23 (permalink)