Quote:
Originally posted by red-beard
If this goes, I don't think Isreal will be leading the charge.
|
well, we (Europeans) sure as hell can't be bothered
and you(Americans) can't pull off another (conventional)war front
it would definately cause more arabs and muslims around the world to become "ticked off"
so it's about as sensible as back when Hitler felt he could take on both the Western and the Eastern front... and then had to realize he didn't have enough resources to dominate both fronts...
it's would be like shooting yourself in the foot with a Howitzer...
and considering that they are definately more willing to die for their cause then you guys, and they in fact basically think it's the best way to get laid...while Gi's in the Middel East , probably don't get laid , at all (bit different then Vietnam as well)
so i'de say they have the upper hand , and they in fact basically think dying is the best way to get laid in a 72 virgins gang bang
the best way is to ignore the buggers and isolate them on all fronts... which is catch 22 , cause it means you won't get their oil...and that's the thing that ticks you guys off, innit?