Quote:
Originally posted by nostatic
I did a quick read and it doesn't say antyhing about pages...it is about him being gay. There is a difference in holding back "outing" info about someone for political purposes and someone holding back info about a possible crime for that reason...
|
Ah, but if you click one little linky in that article you get to this:
http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=52270
In another post, Rogers admitted he had possession of the lurid Foley e-mails before they were posted on the Web.
"As people know, it's not always possible for me to disclose my role in some of the activities.
I can say this. I had the emails before they were on the net. Additionally, I had the additional emails, written by the page to a friend. The story was being written by a number of outlets and I provided additional information to reporters involved in the breaking of this story.
Was (I) the central figure in reporting on Foley’s latest scandal? Never said I was. Was my work on the case important to helping make sure it came out before the election? Yes.
Did I have any idea that the GOP leadership was engaged in a cover-up? Nope. Do I love the fact that they are trying to spin this as "naughty emails?" Yup. because it shows how out of (touch) they are about queer closet cases."
Stinky stinky stinky.