Quote:
Originally posted by Rodeo
I couldn't get past the 1st paragraph. That writer is wacked.
|
Meaning he's not a socialist writer, I already knew that.
Quote:
|
Pat, you've gone off the deep end I'm afraid.
|
Ad hominem attacks are the refuge of the scurrilous, looks like you've company in this thread.
Quote:
|
You pretty much lost me when you claimed it was ok to shoot and kill kids picking apples off your trees,
|
Meaning, you think private property is community property of the thief is young. Note, I did not say I would shoot someone taking apples from my trees, that's not the issue, but you can't seem to see the philosophical bankruptcy of your position here.
Quote:
|
but even before that the problem with anarchy is it just tears down our lives without anything to put in its place. Sure, not everything is perfect, but it's better than the Mad Max world you endorse.
|
Like many, you've confused anarchy with chaos, not to mention with an low budget, apocalyptic movie. In short, Rodeo, you appear to not know what you're talking about in this example you've chosen for yourself.
Anarchy merely implies that there is no government thief taking money from you at gunpoint in exchange for the promise of services for someone else. It does not imply no cost for criminality or stupidity.
Your government is dangerously stupid and criminal, I challenge you to show that petty crime has killed more people, and stolen more loot, than all governments on the planet.
People aren't going to go for that, old man, no matter how many articles you post about dead mothers. [/B][/QUOTE]