[Moneyguy1]

Rick:

Somewhere else, I pointed out that the "situation" allegedly involves a homosexual relationship. The Republican party has worked hard and long to define "correctness" through things like a "sanctity of marriage" amendment movement, yet having a number of openly gay elected officials and staff members. Standing off to one side and just observing, this appears to be schizophrenic in nature, seeming to call homosexuality "bad" and hetrosexuality "good". Therefore, to conclude that Clinton's activities would be looked upon with a bit less distain than if Lewinsky would have been male, is understandable. Given the beliefs of the religious right, a hetrosexual relaionship, while abhorrent, is probably more tolerable that a homosexual relationship. The internal inconsistency of the Republican stand on gender relations does confuse the issue, and walks a razor thin line of logic.

Just the thoughts of one guy trying to figure out just what is going on.