Quote:
Originally posted by skinnerd
I agree....this is the stupidest thread ever!
................
What allows for higher reving is better & lighter valve springs, lighter internal parts, better rod and thru bolts, boat tailing the crank, etc.
Higher compression ratio does not give you higher revs.
Nor does higher air flow.
Fluid dynamics for those that aren't engineers says that higher fluid flow means more pressure drop....not easier for the air to get through.
More power does not give you more rpms....
Where on earth did this notion come from?
There is flaw after flaw after flaw in the reasoning of this post.
|
Thankyou, yes!
Quote:
|
Am I the only one missing the boat here?
|
NO!!! Read my posts, LOL....I can't believe this ***** is sticking at ALL!
Quote:
None of the rationalizing here for a 2.4S to go 165mph and rev to 8500rpm makes any sense.
It's all a bunch of BS.
|
Phew...finally...someone sees the king has no clothes!
The ads a joke, the guys a putz...racing 40 years? In the canyons?? Nice......! I've heard and read enough.
The car is not that nice, sorry. And the ownership kills what the remaining nice parts.
__________________
Jake Gulick, Black Rock, CT.
'73 yellow 911E , & 2003 BMW M3 Cab. Ex: 84 Mazda RX-7 SCCA racer. did ok with it, set some records, won some races, but it wore out, LOL[/B]
|