|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Linn County, Oregon
Posts: 48,818
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Bill Verburg
I thought about closing or moving this thread, may still do that but this is sort of amusing, and first I just want to throw out some facts
1973 Carrera RS has more power, better aero and a theoretical top speed of 153mph, gear limit and aero limit are very close on an RS but a targa aero package is much worse, gearing is the same as for RS
short gears wil lower the theoretical top speed
the pics on e-bay do not show a car even as low and aero efficient as my '72S targa which certainly was never able to hit 145 at any DE or 8500rpm.
stock '72S is redlined a@7200, stock rev limiter 7300, yes you can rev past that, a little
factory claims for top speed of a '72-73 S was 143mph
|
For Gawd's sakes Bill, don't confuse this Malibu guy with FACTS...  According to him, I don't know Jack about the performance of a 2.4 S, because I quoted some C&D test results, which I agreed with. I guess having owned one since 1974 isn't a factor....
I love guys like this....
__________________
"Now, to put a water-cooled engine in the rear and to have a radiator in the front, that's not very intelligent."
-Ferry Porsche (PANO, Oct. '73) (I, Paul D. have loved this quote since 1973. It will remain as long as I post here.)
|