[fastpat]

Originally posted by sammyg2
I kind of scanned the first part and then realized there was nothing of interest there for me.

I'm not surprised. The article was at least partially about you.

What I did get was that some republicans are not happy with Bush, but support him because they are deathly afraid of the alternative. That's me.

Yet, you got exactly what you were afraid of, think of the irony.

The idea of the bleeding heart nutcase libs having another chance to destroy this country is a great motivator.

Bush is all the above and more, much more. He's an admixture of Wilson and F. Roosevelt.

Gore is a freaking lunatic and is worse than any nightmare I can come up with.

You can't name one thing Gore would have been able to accomplish that Bush hasn't done. Bush is Gore as far as government is concerned.

I just saw a commercial with slick willy (clinton, bill that is. the one with the smaller dick) He was claiming that eithanol is 1/3 the cost of gasoline and our entire country should switch to it and eliminate the use of gasoline.
Now, is he really that stupid or is really that bad of a liar?
First, ethanol is every bit as expensive as gasoline, and that is AFTER all the government subsidies that help lower the cost. Without the government's meddling the cost of ethanol would be substantially higher than gas.

Here's a hint, Bush has already mandated ethanol be put into gasoline in greater amounts, and the Republican controlled congress has expanded the subsidies for ethanol, costing us all money, and increasing the use of fossil fuels which are required to make ethanol. Now that's stupid. An additional free hint: Clinton is no longer president.

Second, if the US switched all crop production to corn instead of anything else, there still would still not be enough ethanol produced to completely eliminate the need for gasoline in this country. Probably only cover about 1/3 of it.
What a tool.

Again, Bush ahs signed the new legislation concerning greater use of ethanol, and again, Clinton isn't the president and hasn't been for five years.

You think bush is bad?

The fact that Bush is a bad president is self evident, in fact he's far worse than Clinton was, and certainly no better than Al Gore. The fact that the Republican congress would have stimied Gore in most of his policies would have been a plus. That same congress has repeatedly written Bush a blank check, and Bush wrote in huge amounts.

I'm convinced that either Clinton or gore is the anti-christ or they took lessons from him.

You're not watching the Bush'ists bend you over then.