Quote:
Originally posted by fintstone
Now that is silly. Obviously because an article is written in a newspaper that puts Army in the name doesn't in any way indicate it reflects the opinion of anyone but the author...certainly not that of the military as a whole. That is like saying and article in the New York Times reflects the view of all citizens of New York.
|
If it's "silly" to you, then why did you say it? You said it doesn't reflect the opinions of the military....even though through the years general after general after general stated same....WE NEED TROOPS AND NOW. Rummy KNEW what he had when he went in........so that's NO EXCUSE. That's like me saying I'm going to bake a cake, but I only have 1/4 cup flour, then crying victim because my cake sucked.
Your little "conspiracy" rants about *liberal* this and *liberal* that doesn't cover up the fact that Rummy sucked big time. I'm sorry Rumsfeld couldn't hide his suckiness any longer, but no one can when they suck. The bull***** doesn't work any longer, so maybe you should try another angle....