Quote:
Originally posted by tobster1911
The electronic machine I used this year had a printed record that would scroll one page at a time and you could verify it (which I did). You could change things up to two times. Seems fine by me. I like it better than filling in ovals with a pen.
|
That's all I want. That is to me the best we're going to get.
Yes, machines can be tampered with, there will never, ever, ever be a perfect election, but it's also possible to make it less likely (e.g., ATM WITH paper for banks/customers to ensure all is accurate). But without paper (what a completely moronic and stupid thing to design, it HAD to be intentional, there is no way an ATM manufacturer wouldn't suggest paper!) tampering would be a whole lot easier and impossible to uncover and with the nature of politics, I don't give a ***** what "party" the bastards belong to, we all know power is like a drug.....
This is ALL I want. Thanks for sharing there are actually some machines like this.
From a voter point of view, I want to have some semblence of confidence my vote is counted accurately.... I like the view that you had....that's cool.