Quote:
Originally posted by fintstone
The difference is the Afgan and Iraqi governments openly supported terrorists/terrorism. If we want to stop terrorism...that is as good a place as any. If we don't draw the line here...we never will.
|
15 of 19 men in the 9-11 attack were saudi's
as was the leader mr ben forgotten
and the funding came from saudi tooo
now when the japs bombed pearl harbor
we didnot declare war on peru
we did declare war on them that did attack us
they were based in afgan and protected by the tali-ban
so that was a JUST war but under funded, never given the needed manpower or planing, to get the bad guys
but just why we attacked goddamm insane in iraq
AND NOT THE SAUDI's I still donot understand
except one bushie hated and the other he loves
that has not a thing to do with the supportors of terror or their backers who made the attack possable with funding
as the saudi's are a worse threat, with less freedom and more cash to back the terror
if we wanted to draw the terrorests into a fight
fine afgan was a good a places as any to do that
instead we under maned that effort,
let the bad guys get away,
with poor planing and rushed off to invade iraq
and still have not done the job in afgan
or done spit to the real backers of the 9-11 terror
the saudi
let the cults in iraq kill of eachother
and if and only if
another terrorest takes over
bomb them back into the stone age