Quote:
Originally posted by VaSteve
They recently ruled that computer simulated porn of underage girls was *not* illegal because they couldn't show kids were actually harmed. I don't understand how a 34 year old cop on the other end doesn't somehow fall into the same category.
|
There was a ruling in BC a few years ago, stating that it is legal to publish & possess writing and art that depicts sex with children. Same argument was used... while IT IS disgusting, it is not ILLEGAL to imagine or fantasize about things.
These men are being charged with using the internet to make contact with children for the purpose of sexual encounters. Seems pretty clear cut, especially when they are showing up with condoms.
