Quote:
Originally posted by cool_chick
The basis of your conclusion "intentionally chosen..." appears to be derived on the fact that you don't agree with the interpretation and nothing else to substantiate this "conclusion". Faulty reasoning, and as such, noncredible, Pat.
|
Since no one forced the ACLU to adopt their conclusion, it must have been intentional. Accidental seems unlikely. My disagreement with their position has no bearing on their choice, which by logic was intentional.
Further, my position is based on historical fact, it has no logical challenges that can be made. Those that have attempted to make the "collective rights" challenge invariably use faulty logic or reinterpretation, or outright lies in some cases, of the founders words.
And last, remember, the Second Amendment requires governments to protect a right which is intrinsically yours as a human being. The Second Amendment, like all the amendments in the Bill of Rights, does not grant or create a right.