Quote:
Originally posted by cool_chick
A militia is still not an individual. But why would they include "militia" if they meant individual?
Please note, this is not my position, but this is the ACLU's and many others' position. Me personally, I think the clause is too vague and I can see either interpretation.
Either way, the ACLU feels the constitutionality of this clause is intact, it's not because they're "socialists."
|
BULL****!!!! Why do the defend child molesters, that isn't in the Bill of Rights!! Where in the Bill of Rights does it say that you you should get special rights because who you choose to have sex with??? Why can't you yell
FIRE in a crowded ares, doesn't the 1st give you that right?? OK, on this case, I think the school is going overboard, but what kind of dork would dress like that for a year book photo?? So hardrive,
Quote:
Originally posted by HardDrive
I support the ACLU, and am perplexed as to how people could be so f*cking stupid as to label them a 'liberal' organzation.
Defending the constitution is a liberal cause?
|
Show us where in the Constitution it gives some one the right to advertise for children to molest?? Says alot when you support (your membership dues fund the defense of groups like nambla) a group that sues the
Boy Scouts of America yet defend child molester groups like nambla (
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NAMBLA ) convicted felons, terrorist and illegal aliens, non of which should be protected by the Constitution. You have to be totally f*cking stupoid to support such a group. I'm pretty confident that the founding fathers meant to protect gun owners over giving special rights to gays. When they wrote it, how many homes had guns in them?? Think about that!!