Quote:
Originally posted by Racerbvd
BULL****!!!! Why do the defend child molesters, that isn't in the Bill of Rights!! Where in the Bill of Rights does it say that you you should get special rights because who you choose to have sex with??? Why can't you yell FIRE in a crowded ares, doesn't the 1st give you that right?? OK, on this case, I think the school is going overboard, but what kind of dork would dress like that for a year book photo?? So hardrive, Show us where in the Constitution it gives some one the right to advertise for children to molest?? Says alot when you support (your membership dues fund the defense of groups like nambla) a group that sues the Boy Scouts of America yet defend child molester groups like nambla ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NAMBLA ) convicted felons, terrorist and illegal aliens, non of which should be protected by the Constitution. You have to be totally f*cking stupoid to support such a group. I'm pretty confident that the founding fathers meant to protect gun owners over giving special rights to gays. When they wrote it, how many homes had guns in them?? Think about that!!
|
Their defense of the groups mentioned above isn't an issue with me, it's their attempts to sue government into expansion, and their claim of rights to certain government services is my issue with them; that and their failure to defend the full Bill of Rights, which includes their very weak defense of property rights, so weak that other organizations have been founded to do what the ACLU should have been doing but didn't.
Two examples are the
Fully Informed Jury Association and
The Institute for Justice.