Quote:
Originally posted by cool_chick
Ok, thanks. That's a lot to go through though, looking for lawyers and analysts stating that the amendment as written it clear. Can you point to where whomever states that the clause as written is clear?
And I did "wade" through your one link you provided here. Personally, I didn't find it "voluminous" but hey, whatever. It was one person's interpretation of the amendment, not any sort of proof that the constitution as written is clear. It was one of the two interpretations that can be mete with this vague clause.
You claimed you're a master at grammar, why are you having such a difficult time understanding this painfully simple question?
|
No, I made no such claim, only that I have no trouble interpreting the Second Amendment because it's meaning is clear. Those Second Amendment scholars had no trouble understanding it either, including Stanford Levinson, his statements to the contrary notwithstanding.
Quote:
This is one interpretation by people on a pro-gun site (which means they're not going to put arguments which present another interpretation.....go to an anti-gun side for the other interpretation....this analysis is one-sided and not an effective demonstration that the clause is clear as I've requested from you, surely with your master grammar skills, you can easily understand the question presented for the umtheenth time, right?).
This link, at first glance, still does not appear to be an indication that the clause as written is clear.
|
I don't post web sites with views opposing rights, ever. Rights aren't arguable. Rights are private property, I own my rights completely.