|
Well the real argument isn't a matter of how robust, the 996 does not have a huge history of blown engines. In fact, the main problem is a leaky rear main seal which really is not a problem. Subsidizing engines at 10 years is neither an issue either, as the engine COULD BE rebuilt but Porsche can just as easily throw in a new one, which I would prefer. The argument against turbocharging is odd as well, its a naturally aspirated engine, the other is designed to be turbo charged. Things like pistons, rods, heads, and cranks along with accessory pieces like lubrication vary in the long block of a natrually aspirated engine versus a force induction engine. I mean, turboing a naturally aspirated engine would be pretty irresponsible of them right?
Finally, profit margins? Again the majority run fine, in todays world NO COMPANY REBUILDS ENGINES IN DEALERSHIPS. If you buy any new car and there is a problem with the short block it gets replaced, and I am glad. I would not want some tech or mechanic who can recharge air conditioners to touch my engines bottom end. Give me a new one from the factory.
|