Quote:
Originally posted by island911
"HE" "HE" "HEHEHEHEHHEHE HAHAHAHAHA . . .oh wait, where was I?
Oh yeah, why do YOU dump ALL of this on Bush? Was HE responsible for the severly lacking intel on 9/11/01?
|
There wasn't any "lack" of intelligence about the events that occured on that date, nor for the six months prior to that date. The Bush'ists didn't want all of the intelligence because it didn't coincide with their plans to invade Iraq. According to court records, FBI field agents attempted to sound the warning about the impending attacks and were rebuffed to the point of having their jobs threatened.
Quote:
|
Well, we know Sandy Burgler has destroyed evidence there.
|
Since that allegation has been disproved in a court of law, why do you continue to make it? Do you really think assertions become true if you make them over and over again?
Quote:
|
But back to Who YOU balme FOR FREAKING EVERYTHING! Do you think that Bush (and all the rest of everyone caught with their intel-pants down) hasn't been significantly 'upping' the intel apparatus?
|
There was no shortage of intelligence about the 9/11 attacks, and no shortage of valid intellegence about Iraq prior to March 2003. The Bush'ist Office of Special Plans altered or omitted intelligence data in order to have what was put together showed something other than the truth, and forwarded that to the Congress. That's been documented by a wide variety of sources, including the Inspector General of the Department of Defense.
Really, you should learn these facts before you continue to make the same allegations you've been making for the last 5+ years.