Quote:
Originally posted by lendaddy
You're smart enough to see how cheap that argument is. The underlying statement is "unless you're on the fronlines taking fire you can never vocally support any military action".
Which is an asnine statement. So why be so cheap about it? Why not make a real argument?
|
i never said that, didn't say , any military action
but for this Iraq thing, that wasn't even valid to begin with, for a war that was A a side track distraction from "get OSAMA" B was poorly thought out... as in , what to do AFTER the invasion C had caused more deaths, or at least equalled what happened under Sadam and D caused more Americans to die then 9-11 (wich is still unrelated to IRaq)
so 4 arguments, that make my argument about "not defending it's validity unless you are going there to get your own legs blow off", a good one