[red-beard]

My wife and I were discussing the different candidates for President. On the whole, it seems pretty stupid to discuss them this early, but, it's in the news, etc.

So, we're kicking around what usually makes a good president, and where the good ones are from. You need demonstrated leadership, not being a voice in the choir. You need to be on the national and international stage and be well versed in these issues. Usually, the better presidents are former governors from larger states, ones which are border/coastal states or former Vice Presidents. None of the main candidates meet these criteria.

These do not:

Obama: A Short Term Senator from an Interior State
Hillary: A twice Elected Candidate from NYS, but with the best machine and backing.
Romney: Former Governor from a medium, Coastal State
Giuliani: Former Mayor of the largest City in the US, equiv to Governor of a medium, Coastal State, He does have international experience.
Newt Gingrich, Former Speaker of the House,

These Do:

Jeb Bush, Governor of a large Boarder/Coastal State.
Rick Perry, Governor of a large Boarder/Coastal State.
Al Gore, Former Vice President of the US

As much as I don't care for him, I think Al Gore would be the strongest candidate the Dems can put forward. Not a fan of Gore, his politics or views. But I do see him as having those qualities which could make him a successful Candidate. Add either Obama or Hillary, and I could see him winning. I seriously doubt that Hillary would accept being Veep to Gore, and delaying her run for President to 2012 or 2016. Therefore, I think Obama could make a great running mate. I doubt that

Republicans. Uggh. Every candidate has warts. On the national stage, I think Giuliani has the best national recognition and best chance in a National Election, but may not get past the primary/convention. I think Jeb or Romney have the best chance at the Primary/but would be weak national candidates.

Thoughts?